вЂњThe bowsers quote guest Jim LaCampвЂ™s thesis about Bush and the recovery, then they quote Cavuto as saying:вЂќ вЂWhat was once the Bush recession is now the Bush recovery? Or is it a bit of a stretch?вЂ™ вЂњActually you donвЂ™t have to read very far in to catch the fact that CavutoвЂ™s question has been slightly doctored. вЂCavuto Asks If This Гўв‚¬Е“Is Now The Bush RecoveryГўв‚¬ВќвЂ™ вЂњTwo websites using the same screengrab, with no video. They are now, in all seriousness, proposing that what we are seeing here are the effects of the Bush recovery.вЂ™ вЂFox has raised the stakes and brought in their Гўв‚¬Е“AГўв‚¬Вќ game. вЂњNo surprise, the story spread to other Fox hater sites, like News Corpse:вЂќ вЂOn his Fox News today, Neil Cavuto claimed the stock market rebound is evidence of a Гўв‚¬Е“Bush recoveryГўв‚¬Вќ:вЂ™ вЂњThen they added a little more fabrication to the mix:вЂќ

вЂFox NewsГўв‚¬в„ў Neil Cavuto: Гўв‚¬Е“Is this now the Гўв‚¬ЛњBush RecoveryГўв‚¬в„ўГўв‚¬Вќ?вЂ™ They kicked off the echo chamber mania by posting, tossing in an incendiary (and cleverly inaccurate) headline:вЂќ It starts with those fine, fine folks at Think Progress. вЂњPrepare yourself for an instant classic of disinformation. It was probably something Reagan did thirty years ago.ДЄre even Fox News viewers stupid enough to fall for this? Please tell me they arenвЂ™t. If something good happens it wouldnвЂ™t matter if it were the middle of his second term, he is merely a lucky bystander. To summarize, if something bad happens it doesnвЂ™t matter how early in his term it is, Obama is the owner and the cause of it. The same folks who were insisting that Obama was responsible for every negative occurrence вЂ“ from suicide bombings in Islamabad to pimples on teenagers вЂ“ from the day after his illegitimate inauguration, now assert that Bush, from whom financial duties were stripped when the economy went south in August of 2008, that Bush somehow deserves recognition for his role in the market comeback. They are now, in all seriousness, proposing that what we are seeing here are the effects of the Bush recovery. They hit on the notion of a bear market rally, which they then turned into a persistent talking point.ДЄnd capping off the Fox News campaign to deny Obama any credit for the still advancing market, having now risen about 40% in seven months, Fox has raised the stakes and brought in their вЂњAвЂќ game. I mean, nothing positive could possibly be attributed to this president, so there must be another explanation. This led Fox News to seek a new excuse for good fortune that was clearly driving them nuts. In April the market continued its winning ways. The bulls came out about the same time these guys started to shout.вЂќ Wall StreetвЂ™s sure partying, up six weeks in a row. Undaunted, Fox came up with a unique explanation for why Wall Street would suddenly seem to be reacting positively to a Muslim, communist, alien president. It would rise 21% in 16 days вЂ“ a feat that has not been recorded in modern stock market history Unfortunately for Fox, later the same month the market began what would become an unprecedented turnaround. Last March, Fox News was the first to report that a declining Dow was unambiguously the fault of Obama, who had been in office for a little more than a month.ДЇox declared the declines вЂњObamaвЂ™s Bear Market.вЂќ They illustrated their coverage with colorful charts highlighting the foreboding financial trends that were about to sink all future hopes of America. Passing the 10,000 mark would ordinarily be perceived as good news by most market analysts and millions of investors, many of whom are relying on market performance for their future security and retirement.Д«ut Fox News, the network that celebrates America losing the Olympics, and laments the President being honored with a Nobel Peace Prize, sees things differently.

After months of turmoil, the stock market has clawed its way back to levels that havenвЂ™t been seen for a year.

Jstock market under obama foxnews